I’ve just watched this debate, and for the most part it was quite good.
A few things I took away from it however. Apart from Prof. Dawkins, none of the panel seemed to touch on the point of the motion in their opening comments. There was a good deal of Ad Hominem attacks from the proposing side. They also seemed to rely heavily on variations of the Straw Man and No True Scotsman arguments.
Apart from that, the panel were mostly eloquent in their arguments, the chairman slightly annoying, and the audience questions mostly irrelevant to the motion – attacking elements of Theism and Atheism.
The votes before and after went well for the Atheist point of view.