<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>quietAtheist &#187; Definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quietatheist.com/index.php/tag/definition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quietatheist.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Atheism a Religion?</title>
		<link>http://www.quietatheist.com/index.php/2009/06/is-atheism-a-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.quietatheist.com/index.php/2009/06/is-atheism-a-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Slugsie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quietatheist.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's an old question, and on the surface would seem easy to answer. As an Atheist, to me Atheism isn't a religion.

But I also don't think it is quite that simple.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an old question, and on the surface would seem easy to answer. As an Atheist, to me Atheism <em>isn&#8217;t</em> a religion.</p>
<p>But I also don&#8217;t think it is quite that simple.<br />
<span id="more-220"></span><br />
An oft quoted point of the theistic is that</p>
<blockquote><p>Atheism is a religion, the Supreme Court said so.</p></blockquote>
<p>There are of course a couple of problems with that:</p>
<ol>
<li>Not all of us are Americans (I know, it&#8217;s a surprise to a certain section of the population of this planet), and so the dictates of your judicial system are of little relevance to us.</li>
<li>You committing the logical fallacy of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority" target="_blank">Appeal to Authority</a>.</li>
<li>If you are a theistic American, do you hold all court decisions to the same level of authority? Do you now accept that Intelligent Design is indeed religious in nature?</li>
</ol>
<p>To me, the answer to the question isn&#8217;t a simple yes or no. It&#8217;s a bit more nuanced than that. Exactly what is the question being asked? What point is trying to be made? What information are you actually after?</p>
<p>Lets look at the definition of Religion. The Oxford English Dictionary (the authoritative source for British English) <a href="http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/orexxligion?view=uk" target="_blank">defines Religion</a> thus:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>1</strong> the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. <strong>2</strong> a particular system of faith and worship. <strong>3</strong> a pursuit or interest followed with devotion.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, using definitions 1 or 2, defining Atheism as religion can be likened to defining bald as a hair colour, and not collecting stamps as a hobby. I.e. it isn&#8217;t. However, I can concede that using the third definition an argument could be made that would classify Atheism as at least maybe religious in nature. It&#8217;s not an argument that I would agree with, but I can accept the argument can be made.</p>
<p>There is also another way of looking at Religion that I would argue Atheism does fall into, and in fact is often useful. If you define Religion as:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any worldview that deals with a God or Gods</p></blockquote>
<p>Atheism is, by definition, dealing with a worldview about Gods. As such, it falls within this definition. I also think that&#8217;s it&#8217;s definition that the US Supreme Court decisions are pointing at (but I am neither American, nor a lawyer, so what do I know?). It&#8217;s the definition that, again for our American cousins, allows Atheists to be Atheist with the same freedom under the First Amendment as Christians to be Christian etc.</p>
<p>So, ask me if I&#8217;m religious, and I&#8217;ll tell you &#8220;No, I&#8217;m not&#8221;.</p>
<p>Ask me what religion I am, and I&#8217;ll tell you &#8220;I&#8217;m Atheist&#8221;.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.quietatheist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quietatheist.com/index.php/2009/06/is-atheism-a-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

