<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>quietAtheist &#187; Richarsd Dawkins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quietatheist.com/index.php/tag/richarsd-dawkins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quietatheist.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:48:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Times completely misses the point</title>
		<link>http://www.quietatheist.com/index.php/2009/11/the-times-completely-misses-the-point/</link>
		<comments>http://www.quietatheist.com/index.php/2009/11/the-times-completely-misses-the-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Slugsie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richarsd Dawkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quietatheist.com/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just shoddy journalism of the highest order. I had considered The Times to be a reasonably balanced and reliable news source, but if this article is anything to go by that perception is well off the mark. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article6925781.ece First off, this is not a campaign by Richard Dawkins. Prof Dawkins was a prominent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just shoddy journalism of the highest order. I had considered The Times to be a reasonably balanced and reliable news source, but if this article is anything to go by that perception is well off the mark.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article6925781.ece" target="_blank">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article6925781.ece</a></p>
<div id="attachment_330" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 410px"><a href="http://www.humanism.org.uk/billboards"><img class="size-full wp-image-330 " title="BHA Please Dont Label Me poster" src="http://www.quietatheist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/3mx12m_w565.jpg" alt="3mx12m_w565" width="400" height="142" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">BHA Please Dont Label Me poster</p></div>
<p><span id="more-329"></span>First off, this is not a campaign by Richard Dawkins. Prof Dawkins was a prominent supporter of the original &#8220;There&#8217;s Probably No God, Now Stop Worrying And Enjoy Your Life&#8221; advertising campaign. It wasn&#8217;t his campaign, he just provided some money and lent his support. I too provided money to that campaign does that mean it&#8217;s mine too?</p>
<p>Secondly, the article basically proves the point of the advert, but completely fails to realise it. Those kids are the children of &#8220;Evangelical&#8221; parents, they aren&#8217;t evangelical kids. Not yet anyway. Maybe they will grow up to be evangelical, and that&#8217;s fine. Or maybe they&#8217;ll grow up to be Buddhist, or Muslim, or maybe even atheist. But foisting a world view on them when they are far too young to make an informed choice is infringing on their rights to self determinism.</p>
<p>I am a Sci-Fi fan, but no one would label my daughter as such as a result. I am a software engineer, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that my daughter is too. My daughter <em>is</em> an atheist, but <span style="text-decoration: underline;">she told me that</span>.</p>
<p>Thirdly, this campaign is not in any way shape or form about infringing on the rights of the parents to raise their children under the umbrella of the parents faith, nor to restrict their ability to teach their children about their particular brand of religious dogma. So all the commenter&#8217;s on the article really need to learn to read and comprehend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quietatheist.com/index.php/2009/11/the-times-completely-misses-the-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

